Karewwa And Ors. vs Hussensab Khansaheb Wajantri AIR 2002 SC 504 (2002) 10 SCC 315 We do not dispute the legal position as stated by the learned counsel for the appellant, but the presumption of correctness of an entry in revenue record cannot be rebutted by a statement in the written statement. Mere statement of fact in the written statement is not a rebuttal of presumption of correctness of an entry in the revenue record. The respondent was recorded as a tenant in the revenue record in the year 1973 and under law the presumption is that the entry is correct. It was for the appellant to rebut the presumption by leading evidence. The appellant has not led any evidence to show that entry in the revenue record is Incorrect. We, therefore, do not find any merit in the contention.
SEARCH
CONTENTS OF THIS BLOG
-
▼
2011
(94)
-
▼
October
(17)
- PROCEDURAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS OF LAND REVENUE RECOR...
- HOW TO KNOW TENANCY IN AGRICULTURAL LAND BEFORE TR...
- FAMILY ARRANGEMENT NEED NOT BE REGISTERED
- ENTRY IN REVENUE RECORD CANNOT BE REBUTED BY MERE ...
- TENANT UNDER MYSORE LAND REVENUE CODE 1888
- TENANCY UNDER LAND REFORMS
- RELAVANCE OF SPOT INSPECTION REBUTING PRESUMPTION ...
- WOMEN RIGHT TO ANCESTRAL PROPERTY – WOMEN WHO DIED...
- Mysore Cultivation of Fallow Lands Act, 1951
- GROW MORE FOOD SCHEME LAND GRANT DOES NOT ATTRACT ...
- PERSONS WHO GOT GRANT OF LANDS AS TENANTS DOES NOT...
- WHEN IT IS NOT A FREE GRANT AND WHEN IT IS FOR UPS...
- WHEN THERE IS NO ORIGINAL DOCUMENT – TO PRODUCE SE...
- PRESUMPTION OF GENUINENESS OF OLD DOCUMENTS DOES N...
- DEPRESSED DHARKASTH RULES AND NO RULE PERIOD IN I...
- REGARDING IMPROVEMENTS MADE ON THE LAND – NO PROTE...
- AN INTERESTING FACT OF FABRICATION OF REVENUE RECO...
-
▼
October
(17)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment